AG百家乐在线官网

Live

Money blog: Customers angry as online retailer shuts accounts; 400% pay rise for team featured by Netflix doc

Welcome to the Money blog, Sky News' personal finance and consumer hub. Today: ASOS customers are upset after accounts were closed, a 400% pay rise for cheerleaders who starred in a Netflix doc, and our weekly Mortgage Guide. Sign up for our weekly newsletter below.

Why you can trust Sky News
Sign up to Money newsletter for exclusive tips, features and sneak previews

Sky News has launched a brand-new free Money newsletter - bringing the kind of content you enjoy here in the Money blog directly to your inbox every Friday.

As a newsletter subscriber, you'll get top tips and exclusive content that goes beyond the blog, with digestible information to help you make smarter decisions on your savings, mortgages, holidays and much more.

And you'll also get first looks at popular features such as Money Problem, Cheap Eats and What It's Really Like To Be A...

In this week's edition, readers can enjoy a tip for saving money on the contents of your medicine cabinet, a guide to eSims beating roaming charges, and a look at a water meter related Money Problem.

We also break down what this week's hold in the interest rate means for you.

All of this is curated by the team behind the award-winning Money blog that is read by millions of Britons each month.

Sign up today and join our Money community....

Primark staff ordered to return to the office four days a week

Primark product staff have been told they will have to return to the office four days a week from September. 

The update, which is effective from 15 September, applies to employees based at the brand's Arthur Ryan House office in Dublin.

Product teams will still be able to work from home on Fridays and finish at 2pm, reports.

"After experiencing remote, hybrid, and full-time models in recent years, we will be reintroducing a four-day in-office work week for our product teams," a Primark spokesperson told the publication. 

"We know that when our product teams are together in-person, it strengthens productivity, creativity and development, ultimately delivering the best offering for our customers. 

"We understand how important balance is, and we will continue to offer flexible working hours and remote working on Fridays with a 2pm finish."

It's not the only company to push for more in-office working. John Lewis recently ordered its commercial teams to work in the office three days a week from next month. 

TalkTalk plots break-up of telecoms and broadband group

By Mark Kleinman, City editor

TalkTalk, the telecoms and broadband group founded by Sir Charles Dunstone, is preparing to hire City advisers to oversee a break-up of the company.

Sky News has learnt that investment banks were asked to pitch this week for a mandate to oversee a potential sale of TalkTalk's two remaining businesses: its consumer arm and PXC, its wholesale and network division.

City sources said today that Barclays and Morgan Stanley were among the banks in the frame to oversee the strategic review, which has been triggered by separate unsolicited approaches for both parts of the group.

These cheerleaders just got a 400% raise - this is why it matters

They cheered for a team worth upwards of $10bn (拢7.4bn), but for years, the Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders were paid just $15 (拢11) an hour.

But now, "America's Sweethearts" have just secured a 400% raise. 

The wage increase is revealed at the end of the second season of the hit Netflix documentary that features the team of dancers.

It does not disclose any specifics of the pay rise. 

Jada McLean, who retired from the squad after having led the effort to secure higher pay,  she made $15 an hour and $500 (拢370) for each appearance last year, based on experience. 

After the pay raise, she said, veteran cheerleaders could soon make more than $75 an hour.

Why does it matter?

As cheerleader Megan McElaney says: "Dancers are athletes. They have so much value."

But NFL teams across the country have been facing increasing fan scrutiny for their low pay to cheerleaders, even though they contribute skilled labour (could you do a backflip in cowboy boots?) and risk injury, and are prominent faces of the brand. 

One former cheerleader, Kat Puryear, compared her yearly pay to that of "a Chick-fil-A [restaurant] worker who works full-time."

In comparison, NFL football players can command salaries of millions of dollars.

In 2018, former cheerleader Erica Wilkins filed a class action lawsuit against the Cowboys that resulted in a pay increase in 2019, from $8 to $12 per hour and from $200 to $400 per game. 

Wilkins, who cheered for the Cowboys from 2014 to 2017, claimed she sometimes made less than minimum wage and that the cheerleaders were paid less than the Cowboys' mascot.

Now, the campaign by Wilkins, McLean and others has literally paid off.

'Sorry for having a baby': Customers criticise ASOS for closing their accounts

By Megan Harwood-Baynes, cost of living specialist

ASOS is facing a backlash for closing the accounts of customers making high returns, with one woman telling the brand: "Sorry I had a child and my postpartum body doesn't fit your inconsistent sizes."

Last year, ASOS announced a new 'fair use policy' in a bid to cut down on the number of items being returned.

Frankie has been an ASOS customer for over two decades, first registering with the website back in the early 2000s.

"I鈥檓 ten months postpartum now, so you can imagine that I鈥檝e had to order multiple sizes to see what fits me," the 33-year-old from London told Money.

And while she has kept just under 拢700 of products so far this year, she has had to return items that don't fit - and some that were faulty.

"I'd hardly call that [being] an unloyal customer," she said.

Faulty jeans and body image fears

Despite reaching out directly to the fast fashion giant and telling them she felt she was being "penalised for having a changing body shape", she was told she had violated the brand's fair use terms on returns, and so her account had been permanently closed.

"If I ordered a size 12 from ASOS, one would fit, one would be like a size 8, and another would be like a size 14," she said.

"I just ordered a skirt and some shorts, and a pair of tights varying from L to XL, and I鈥檝e only been able to keep the tights.

"The shorts are either stuck to my thighs or fall from my waist
Other times I鈥檒l keep the whole haul."

She said she has been left feeling insecure, like she is "a nuisance for not knowing my size, even though their sizes aren't consistent across clothing".

"I worry that for more impressionable people, they鈥檒l think something is wrong with their body and it鈥檚 their fault for making returns."

She also said ASOS needs to have better quality controls, adding: "I was just as dissatisfied receiving faulty jeans as they were having to refund me."

'Clearly loyalty isn't recognised'

Frankie isn't the only mother affected.

One X user wrote on the social media site:  "Had this account for years and always order from ASOS but clearly loyalty isn鈥檛 recognised since I had my chat closed when I enquired about it鈥� 

"I do most of my shopping on ASOS and can鈥檛 see how my returns are a lot. 

"God forbid a gal doesn't know her size/style postpartum."

'I thought it was a scam email'

Marie Cavanagh, a 31-year-old energy consultant from London, told Sky News her account closure came as a "shock". 

"At first I thought the message saying my account was being closed was a scam email," she said.

"I have asked ASOS for more of an explanation as to why it was closed and was simply told that the decision was final, and that I wouldn't be given any more information.

"The way this has been managed is appalling. As a loyal customer I feel really let down." 

She tried to email the ASOS customer service team, but received a bounce-back reply saying the inbox was full. 

Why is ASOS closing accounts?

ASOS first announced the policy last year, saying it was reducing its free returns policy due to the rising costs associated with handling returns. 

"Serial returners" were told they would be charged 拢3.95 to send items back, unless they kept 拢40 worth of their order (for those with a Premier subscription, it was 拢15). 

But those who consistently returned items have started being told their accounts are being permanently banned.

An email, seen by Money, shows even Premier customers risk being banned. 

It's not a new policy, but in the last 24 hours, there has been a noticeable uptick in the number of people posting on X to complain about the closures.

"My account is being closed due to high returns, yet my last two orders were sun tan lotion and eyelashes, both of which I kept.  Apart from that, I鈥檝e barely used my ASOS account. 

"What a way to treat loyal customers since the days of As Seen on Screen!" (As Seen on Screen was the original name of the brand, before it became ASOS in 2002). 

Another added: "At least you've been given 30 days. Mine was closed with immediate effect. Last thing I ordered was a pair of trainers in two different sizes. 

"Returned the size I didn't need = account closed."

ASOS says 'small group' of customers affected

It's understood that ASOS maintains its free returns policy is still enjoyed by the vast majority of its customers, and that the online retailer has sought to help shoppers find the correct size with its Fit Assistant tool. 

In a statement to Money, ASOS said: "We recently closed the accounts of a small group of customers whose shopping activity has consistently fallen outside our Fair Use policy. 

"This helps us maintain our commitment to offering free returns to all customers across all core markets."

Octopus Energy launches first EV charger - and it has a freebie (but you'll need to be quick)

Octopus Energy has launched its first home EV charger, and it could mean refilling your car for as little as 2p per mile.

It is plugged into the company's popular EV tariff, Intelligent Octopus Go, which, when combined with its Drive Pack tariff, means potentially unlimited charging for just 拢30 a month.

And if you fancy a freebie, the first 100 customers will get 5,000 free miles - enough to get from Land's End to John O'Groats (or just to and from work a fair few times). 

Drivers can sign up . 

Aldi could be forced to 'rethink business model' after copycat cider ruling, says lawyer

Aldi could be forced to "rethink its business model" in the wake of its trademark defeat to Thatchers cider, a lawyer for the drinks brand has said. 

It's a legal case that has been brewing for some months, but last week the family-run cider brewer from Somerset won an appeal against the discount supermarket for trademark infringement over its cloudy lemon cider.

The Court of Appeal said Aldi had used the branding for its own cider to "convey the message that the Aldi product was like the Thatchers product, only cheaper", and had piggybacked on the reputation of the Thatchers brand.

Thomas Chartres-Moore, head of intellectual property at law firm Stephens Scown, told  the ruling will make it harder for Aldi to produce own-label items that closely resemble leading brands.

Aldi had argued that shoppers would be able to tell the difference between the two products.

"This changes the landscape because it gives brands a piece of domestic law to hang their hat on," said Chartres-Moore.

"If market leaders double down on their brand protection and take the same route as Thatchers, then it is going to close a door for Aldi, and they will have to rethink their business model."

Chartres-Moore added the ruling could also weaken Aldi's long-running 'like brands only cheaper' slogan, which was referenced by the Court of Appeal judge.

An Aldi spokesperson said it goes to "great lengths" to adhere to copyright guidelines.

"We think the Court of Appeal was wrong in its interpretation of the facts of this particular case," they added. 

"Aldi will continue to champion consumers by offering low-price, affordable alternatives to more expensive branded products. The courts were clear that Aldi customers know what they are buying when they shop with us."

Trump delay provides tentative relief for markets - but could there be inflation trouble ahead?

By James Sillars, business and economics reporter

There's a tentative relief rally across stock markets this morning.

Donald Trump's decision - to not make a decision on US involvement in Israel's air attacks against Iran for two weeks - has also helped oil prices step back.

The FTSE 100 is 0.5% up at 8,835.

Financial, mining and real estate stocks are leading the charge - with energy proving the main drag.

That can be explained by the decline of more than 2% for Brent crude today.

It's trading at $77 a barrel.

Despite that fall, the oil price remains around 20% up on where it stood at the start of the month.

UK day-ahead natural gas prices are more than 25% higher over the same period.

A sustained rally for both would not bode well for the months ahead in terms of inflation.

'Inflation and customer cutbacks' blamed for big dive in retail sales

By James Sillars, business and economics reporter

Retail sales volumes suffered their largest monthly fall since December 2023 last month, according to official figures, which suggest a link to rising bills.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported a 2.7% decline in the quantity of goods bought in May compared to the previous month.

The body said its interaction with retailers suggested "inflation and customer cutbacks" accounted for the fall, which was across all categories, but led by food.

拢28 sunscreen and supermarket own brand fail standard safety tests, consumer group finds

Ahead of what's expected to be a scorcher of a weekend across the country, it's a good time to restock on sunscreen.

Before heading to the chemist, however, you may want to be aware of new findings that show two brands may not do as they say on the bottle.

Lab tests carried out by the consumer group Which? show a family sunblock costing 拢28 fails to provide the protection it promises.

The group found Ultrasun Family SPF30, which comes in a 150ml size and sells itself as "perfect for the whole family" (and "especially suitable for children and those with sensitive skin"), did not meet minimum UVA protection levels.

If you want to know the specifics, it scored a 9.1 and then a 9.5 in a retest, when it should be 10 or more.

Of the 15 brands tested by Which?, Ultrasun was joined by one other in earning its "Don't Buy" label - Morrisons Moisturising Sun Spray SPF30.

This is sold for 拢3.75, which gets you 200ml.

It scored 25.7 and 20.7 in UVB/SPF tests - short of the 30 needed to pass.

Cheap solutions

Natalie Hitchins, head of home products and services at Which?, said it was "really concerning" that "widely available sunscreens could be putting families at risk".

But the tests did also show, she added, that there were plenty of cheap alternatives meeting their standards.

"While shoppers should avoid buying our Don't Buys, our results prove that there's no need to splash out to keep you and your loved ones safe in the sun as we've found cheap, reliable options", she said.

These include Lidl's Cien Sun Protect Spray SPF30 High - costing 拢3.79 for 200ml - and Aldi's Lacura Sensitive Sun Lotion SPF50+, priced at 拢2.99 for 200ml.

How the testing is done

Which? says it uses industry-recognised test methods, which meet British and international standards.

These are carried out at independent labs.

If a product fails on its first test, Which? repeats the test. If it passes on the second attempt, a third test is done. 

If it fails SPF or UVA twice overall, it becomes a Don't Buy. 

What Ultrasun and Morrisons say

A spokesperson for Ultrasun said it was fully confident in its testing protocols and that its detailed testing processes continued to not only meet, but also surpass, industry standards.

It also said its chosen testing protocol was one of the strictest available.

Morrisons said it was looking closely at the data and working with its supplier to carry out additional independent testing.